User talk:Saint-djc

Welcome!

Hello, Saint-djc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dunc|☺ 08:26, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Football links

Hi,

I noticed you were new and had been editing football articles, so I thought I'd give you a few links that it took me a while to find. Hope they're useful.

User:Sjorford/Football - comprehensive list of football articles on Wikipedia
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football - place to discuss football articles
Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Association football - good page for editors who are interested in football

CTOAGN 14:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby union project

There's a Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union that you probably don't know about. The league equivalent is working quite nicely but the union one only has five participants. So I'm leaving messages on the talk pages of the main contributors. You don't have to sign up but your contribution would be welcomed.GordyB 11:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPRU Announcement template

Hey, I see you are a participant of Wikiproject Rugby Union. A template has been created {{WPRU Announcements}} for the project. It's function is to allow users to better communicate and co-ordinate tasks. Please consider placing it on your user page. Thanks. - Shudda ^talk 11:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Matthew Williams

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Matthew Williams, by SkierRMH (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Matthew Williams seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Matthew Williams, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive

For the 2007 Rugby World Cup WikiProject Rugby union is launching an Improvement Drive for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup.

We need your help! Here is what you can do:

Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
Promote the project and encourage others to join.

The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!

For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.

Shudde ^talk 05:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Elliott

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Anthony Elliott, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ForeverDEAD 21:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of England national rugby union team (u19)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on England national rugby union team (u19), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because England national rugby union team (u19) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting England national rugby union team (u19), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sam Harding

A tag has been placed on Sam Harding requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 23:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy to give you a chance to assert notability.--Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Simpson

If the other (newer) Joe Simpson was of a high notability I would argur your case. But as the other Joe Simpson captained a country I believe he is the more notable player. This has been shown before in such articles as Ken Jones (rugby player). FruitMonkey (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Saint-djc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 198 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Darragh O'Mahony - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jon Petrie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Conor O'Shea - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Shaun Longstaff - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Simon Mannix - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sam Harding - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
James Brooks (rugby) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Niall Malone - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Daren O'Leary - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gonzalo Camacho

The article Gonzalo Camacho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP article with no references, no indication of notability, comprising of a single line which isn't even a complete sentence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jdrewitt (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Gustard

The article Paul Gustard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 06:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mat Tait (disambiguation)

The article Mat Tait (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]